We Should Not Accept Scientific Results That Have Not Been Repeated – Facts So Romantic – Nautilus

irreproducibility in itself was not the problem—rather, it was its extent

Sociologists of science have consistently identified “public recognition” as scientists’ primary motivating factor. … The nature of scientific motivation is also evident in scientific reward systems.

In the culture of modern science, it is better to be wrong than to be second.

To make the desire for recognition compatible aligned with prioritizing good science, we need quality metrics that are independent of sociological norms. Above all, objective quality should be based on the concept of independent replication: A finding would not be accepted as true unless it is independently verified.

Source: We Should Not Accept Scientific Results That Have Not Been Repeated – Facts So Romantic – Nautilus